14/02/2026 3:39 am
Topic starter
Notifications
Clear all
APS-C Mirrorless Cameras
4
Posts
5
Users
0
Reactions
193
Views
0
Hey everyone! I’ve finally made the jump and picked up the Sony a6700, and I am absolutely loving the compact form factor for my street and landscape photography. I have a big trip to the Swiss Alps coming up in a few weeks, and I’m realizing that my current tripod—a bulky, old aluminum beast—is just way too much to lug around in a hiking pack.
I’m specifically looking for something that complements the a6700’s size. Since the camera is relatively lightweight, I don't feel like I need a massive rig, but I am a bit worried about stability when I have my longer lenses attached. I usually swap between the Sigma 18-50mm f/2.8 and the Sony 70-350mm telephoto. That telephoto lens is surprisingly light, but it still creates a bit of a lever arm that might be tricky for a flimsy tripod if the wind picks up on a ridge.
My main priorities are packed length and weight. Ideally, I’d love something that folds down to under 15 inches so it fits inside my 20L travel backpack or hooks securely onto the side without swinging everywhere. I've been eyeing the Peak Design Travel Tripod and some of the carbon fiber offerings from Sirui or Ulanzi, but I’m feeling a bit overwhelmed by the options. Is carbon fiber worth the extra cash for an APS-C setup, or should I stick to a high-quality aluminum model to save some money for glass?
Budget-wise, I’m hoping to stay under $350, but I’m willing to invest a bit more if it’s a "buy it once" kind of situation. I’m mostly shooting blue hour landscapes and some long exposures of waterfalls, so it needs to be rock-steady for at least 10-15 second exposures.
Has anyone here found the "perfect" balance for their a6700? What is your top recommendation for a compact travel tripod that’s sturdy enough for this specific camera but won’t break my back on a 10-mile hike?
4 Answers
12
14/02/2026 3:39 am
sooo i’ve spent years trying to find the "perfect" setup and honestly... it’s tough. unfortunately, i had issues with flimsy legs in the past that just couldn't handle the wind. for your a6700 and that 70-350mm lens, here is what i think might work best for you: • Peak Design Travel Tripod (Aluminum): basically the king of packing small. it fits inside most 20L bags but it’s actually a bit heavy for hiking.
• Ulanzi & COMAN Zero Y Carbon Fiber Travel Tripod: yeah this one is lighter, but the ball head is kinda annoying to adjust... i found it wasnt as good as expected for long exposures in the wind.
• Sirui AM-225 Carbon Fiber Tripod with B-00K Ball Head: maybe my top pick for stability? no center column means less vibration for those waterfall shots. tbh carbon fiber is totally worth the cash for a 10-mile hike. gl in the alps! 👍
10
14/02/2026 4:10 am
> I’m specifically looking for something that complements the a6700’s size. Hey! For that 70-350mm, I'd compare the Sirui T-025SK Carbon Fiber Travel Tripod and the Leofoto LS-225C Carbon Fiber Tripod with LH-25 Ball Head. The Sirui is super affordable and folds to 12", but the Leofoto is lowkey sturdier for long exposures since it has no center column. Carbon fiber is TOTALLY worth it for the a6700; it keeps the rig light and rigid for the Alps. Both are great choices!
2
14/02/2026 4:24 am
late to the party but i feel u on the Alps trip! pro tip: check out The Center Column website—it’s basically the gold standard for stability testing. for an a6700, aluminum is okay, but for 10-mile hikes? my back says the carbon versions mentioned earlier are worth it lol. quick question tho: are you shooting at eye level or are you okay with a shorter max height? that changes which budget brands you should look at. gl!
2
18/02/2026 4:57 pm
Honestly, looking at what everyone else said, it seems like the choice basically boils down to whether you want "innovative" features or just a solid set of legs. I'm still relatively new to the gear side of things, but from what I've seen in my own research, the market is SO flooded right now. A few things I've noticed from a market perspective:
- The "big" name brands charge a massive premium for stuff that packs down small, but users sometimes complain about them being a bit "fiddly" in the field.
- There are a ton of newer manufacturers offering carbon fiber at aluminum prices, but I think the leg locks might not last as long? - IIRC, someone told me that some mid-range brands actually share the same parts, so you're sometimes just paying for the logo. I'm not 100% sure, but I've heard that for 15-second exposures, the fewer leg sections you have, the better. Maybe look for something with 3 or 4 sections instead of 5? It might not pack as SMALL, but it could save your shots if the wind picks up. Basically, just make sure you can return it if it feels too light!
