I finally pulled the trigger on the a7C II after years of lugging around my chunky a7R III and I am honestly loving the form factor but man, my current lenses look and feel hilarious on this thing. I have been a full-frame shooter for ages so I know my way around the FE mount but I am hitting a wall trying to find that perfect one lens setup for a trip to Tokyo I have coming up in about three weeks.
My logic was that I would just use my 24-70 GM II but it completely defeats the purpose of having a compact body. It is front-heavy and just... not fun to carry all day. So I was thinking about maybe going the prime route? I looked at those small Sony G primes like the 40mm f2.5 and they seem great for the size but then I worry I will miss the wide end when I am walking through the city. Then I saw the new 24-50 f2.8 G which seems like a good middle ground but is it actually small enough to justify the price?
Budget is roughly $800 give or take though I could push it if something is truly life-changing. I mainly do street photography and some environmental portraits of my wife while we are out. I really want to keep the whole rig fitting in a small sling bag.
Currently debating between:
Ive always been a zoom guy for travel but the a7C II makes me want to go minimal. If I go with a single prime am I gonna regret not having that 24mm reach? Or is the 40mm normal enough to cover most things? Just feels weird finally having a small camera and not knowing which glass actually respects that size... what are you guys actually using on these compact bodies?
> I looked at those small Sony G primes like the 40mm f2.5 and they seem great for the size totally agree with you. i picked one up recently and im so happy with how it handles. it works well for street stuff because nobody thinks youre some pro photographer. honestly, that 40mm view is easy to get used to and the tiny footprint is just worth the trade-off for a big city trip.