Honestly I'm just fed up with the weight of these big zooms and the f2.8 limit is starting to really annoy me for indoor stuff. I've got a huge track meet coming up in three weeks down in Florida and my current setup is just killing my shoulders during those long days.
My logic was that a fast prime would give me that look I want and better AF speed on the a9 III but I'm totally stuck. I've already dropped way too much on the bodies so I'm looking at maybe 6k or 7k max. Is the 300mm f2.8 the way to go or should I just suck it up and find a used 400? I just need something that isnt gonna break my back...
I spent a decade hauling around heavy glass and unfortunately, my experience with the bigger stuff lately hasn't been as rosy as the marketing makes it out to be. Last summer I took the Sony FE 400mm f/2.8 GM OSS out for a regional championship and by day two, I was basically ready to toss it in the nearest trash can. Dont get me wrong, the bokeh is creamy as heck, but even on a monopod, my neck was killing me. I tried grabbing a used one to save cash but the copy I got had weird AF hunting issues on the a1, so I sent it back. Total headache. If youre trying to save your back and stay under that 7k limit, here is the breakdown of what I have actually used:
@Reply #2 - good point! Lugging a 400mm in the Florida humidity is a recipe for heat stroke, tbh. I would suggest looking at these two before you buy:
You're spot on about the weight! That 300 is definitely the way to go, my back felt fantastic after using one at a track meet last year. Total game changer!
Gonna try this over the weekend. Will report back if it works!