Hey everyone! I just recently upgraded to the Sony ZV-E10 II, and while I’m loving the improved sensor and features, I’m really struggling to find the perfect wide-angle lens for my vlogging setup. I’ve been using the 16-50mm kit lens, but honestly, once I turn on the Active Stabilization, the crop factor makes it way too tight for handheld 'talking head' shots. I feel like my face is taking up the whole frame and you can't see any of the background!
I’m looking for something wide enough to show my surroundings while keeping the setup lightweight for long days of shooting. I’ve been eyeing the Sony 11mm f/1.8 because I’ve heard great things about that blurry background look, but the Sigma 10-18mm f/2.8 also looks tempting for the extra versatility. Since the ZV-E10 II doesn't have in-body stabilization, I’m curious if certain lenses work better with the camera's electronic steady shot than others.
My budget is around $500-$750, and fast, quiet autofocus is a absolute must for me. For those of you already using the Mark II for video, what lens has given you the best balance for walk-and-talk style vlogs without feeling too bulky on a small gimbal? Would love to hear your recommendations!
Check out the Sony metadata list. Sony E 11mm F1.8 is *amazing* for bokeh, but Sigma 10-18mm F2.8 DC DN Contemporary gives way more versatility. Honestly, both fit ur budget perfectly tho!!
> Look at the Sony E PZ 10-20mm F4 G. Since it’s an internal zoom, the barrel never extends, which is a massive safety plus for your gimbal motors... Yeah I totally agree that the internal zoom thing sounds WAY safer for the camera especially if youre like me and still figuring out how to balance a gimbal properly without breaking something!! Honestly I’ve been doing tons of market research since I just got the ZV-E10 II and I found that the Tamron 11-20mm f/2.8 Di III-A RXD is actually a really solid alternative to the Sigma 10-18mm. It’s a bit bigger but it has weather sealing which makes me feel way more comfortable taking it outside in the humidity or rain idk if that matters to you but for the price it feels like a tank. The Sigma is super small but I worry about how delicate it feels compared to the Tamron or the Sony G lenses. Tbh picking between all these brands is so confusing because they all have different strengths but if you want that f/2.8 brightness and weather protection for your investment the Tamron is definitely worth a look even if native Sony glass is better for the stabilization metadata stuff!
Just saw this thread and ngl i am also pretty new to this. I have been really worried about the crop factor too because I dont want my face to look like a giant potato on screen. Since you are worried about the active stabilization crop, have you thought about a more diy stabilization route? I have been trying to use Sony Catalyst Browse on my computer instead of the in-camera settings. It is basically a diy way to fix shaky footage and it gives you more control over the crop than the camera does, which might save you from needing the widest lens possible. For a lens that isnt too expensive, I have been looking at the Samyang AF 12mm f/2.0 E. It is pretty light and seems easy to handle for someone like me who is still learning the ropes.
> I’m curious if certain lenses work better with the camera's electronic steady shot than others. Honestly, for maximum reliability with Active SteadyShot, you need native glass that supports full gyro metadata and breathing compensation. Look at the Sony E PZ 10-20mm F4 G. Since it’s an internal zoom, the barrel never extends, which is a massive safety plus for your gimbal motors during long shoots. Their isn't a better option if you want to ensure the electronic stabilization works *perfectly* without frame jitters. It’s super lightweight and the 10mm focal length is basically required to fight that heavy crop. F4 might seem slow, but for vlogging it’s the most reliable "set it and forget it" lens in the lineup tbh.
Just sharing my experience: 1. I struggled with that heavy crop too... basically had to switch to a wide prime from Sony to get my field of view back.
2. Native glass is just more reliable for the electronic steady shot metadata!!
3. Honestly, go with Sony; you cant go wrong for the AF speed and it keeps the gimbal motors safe since it's so light... gl!
^ This. Also, I've gotta politely disagree with the idea of relying on software fixes like Catalyst Browse. In my experience, spending hours at a desk trying to stabilize footage is just a massive time sink. Over the years, I've tried many of those DIY post-processing methods and they usually just result in more frustration than they're worth... you lose so much time.