I've been shooting with my Sony FX3 for a few months now, mostly using zooms, but I’m looking to grab a high-quality wide-angle prime to really step up my cinematography. I do a lot of handheld and gimbal work, so I’m looking for something with fast, reliable autofocus and minimal focus breathing. I’m stuck between the Sony 20mm f/1.8 G and the 24mm f/1.4 GM, though I’ve also heard great things about the Sigma 20mm Art. Since the FX3 is so video-centric, I need a lens that balances well and handles low-light interiors without a struggle. What’s your go-to wide prime for this body, and do you think the G Master price jump is actually worth it for video?
Seconding the recommendation above! Honestly, the Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G is the sweet spot. But id add that if you go for the Sony FE 24mm f/1.4 GM, you get that insane XD Linear Motor tech. It's way faster for tracking subjects. Also, dont forget the FX3 has focus breathing compensation that ONLY works with Sony glass, so id skip the Sigma 20mm f/1.4 DG DN Art for this specific setup. gl!
TL;DR: The Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G is the winner for value, but the Sigma 20mm f/2 DG DN Contemporary is a great budget-friendly alternative. yo, +1 to what was said earlier! i totally agree that the 20mm G is the way to go. honestly, when i first got my FX3, i was sooo tempted to drop my savings on the Sony FE 24mm f/1.4 GM cuz of the hype. i actually bought it, but realized for gimbal and handheld work, the difference was tiny for such a huge price jump. i ended up returning it for the Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G instead. that saved me hundreds, which basically paid for my SmallRig Camera Cage for Sony FX3 and extra Sony NP-FZ100 batteries. if ur really tight on cash, the Sigma 20mm f/2 DG DN Contemporary is another solid, light choice for about $600. basically, unless u NEED f/1.4 for super dark interiors, the GM price isnt worth it imo. gl! 👍
I totally agree with the 20mm G recommendations - it is basically the GOAT for this body. But from a DIY enthusiast perspective, I think there is a lot to be said about how you handle the setup and the footage AFTER the shoot, which might change your mind about the price jump.
Sooo, i've been using the Sony FX3 Full-Frame Cinema Line Camera since launch and honestly, lens choice makes or breaks your gimbal setup. If you're doing a lot of handheld work, weight distribution is everything. Here's how I see the options: 1. Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G: This is highkey the gold standard for the FX3. It’s light, the AF is basically silent, and it handles low light like a champ. Since the FX3 has that internal breathing compensation, this lens works perfectly with it. For gimbal work on something like the DJI RS 3 Pro, it’s so much easier to balance than a heavier prime. 2. Sony FE 24mm f/1.4 GM: The image quality is stunning, but for video? Idk if the price jump is worth it unless you're shooting wide open at f/1.4 constantly. It’s a bit heavier, and 24mm can actually feel a bit tight for interior handheld work compared to 20mm. 3. Sigma 20mm f/1.4 DG DN Art: Seriously sharp glass, but it's a bit of a chonk. If you're doing long shoots, your wrists will feel that extra weight. Also, you lose out on the native Sony breathing compensation, which is a big deal for cinematography. Tbh, I’d suggest the Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G. It's the most reliable choice for a video-centric workflow. It hits that sweet spot of being wide enough for tight spaces without the distortion you get at 14mm or 16mm. Plus, it’s easier on the wallet. gl!
100% agree
Great info, saved!