Hey everyone! I’ve recently upgraded to the Sony FX3 and an a7S III for my video work, and I’m struggling to pick the right wide-angle lens. I mostly shoot handheld and on a DJI RS3, so weight and fast autofocus performance are huge priorities for me. I’ve been looking at the Sony 16-35mm GM II, but I’m also curious if a fast prime like the 20mm f/1.8 G might be better for low-light interiors and architectural shots. I really want that cinematic look without too much edge distortion. Does anyone have experience with these specific combos on a gimbal? Which wide-angle glass would you suggest for a mix of real estate and event work?
Sooo, just catching up on this thread. I’ve been shooting real estate and events for years now, and honestly, i’ve tried basically every wide-angle combo for the Sony FX3. For your situation on the DJI RS 3, here is what I recommend based on my experience: * Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G: This is highkey the secret weapon for gimbal work. It’s super light so your motors won't struggle, and that f/1.8 is *literally* a life saver for dim interiors. Over the years, I've found it has much less edge distortion than the zooms at their widest, which makes your architectural shots look way more professional, you know?
* Sony FE 16-35mm f/2.8 GM II: This is amazing for versatility, but it's heavier. Plus, if you zoom in or out, it can sometimes throw off the balance of the DJI RS 3 slightly, which is annoying mid-shoot. In my experience, the 20mm prime gives that "cinematic" feel more easily because the glass is just so sharp. Anyway, if u prioritize low light and easy balancing, go for the prime! gl!
Seconding the recommendation above for the 20mm! Honestly, if you're doing a lot of gimbal work on the DJI RS 3, the Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G is basically the perfect middle ground for price and performance. I've used the Sony FE 16-35mm f/2.8 GM II and while it’s incredible glass, the shifting weight when you zoom can be a REAL headache for your gimbal motors if you aren't careful... it just feels safer to stick with a prime for long shoots. A few practical things to consider:
* The 20mm is much lighter, which saves your arms during long event days.
* That extra stop of light at f/1.8 is HUGE for dimly lit architectural shots where you can't always set up lights.
* It’s way more budget-friendly than the GM II, leaving room for other gear. I mean, it really comes down to whether you need that 16mm width, but for most real estate work, 20mm on full-frame is plenty wide without looking too "fisheye." gl with the choice!
I've had a bit of time to think about this and honestly I'm super satisfied with my current setup. For total reliability on a gimbal like the DJI RS3, the Sony FE 16-35mm f/2.8 GM II is hard to beat. It's surprisingly light and the autofocus is just rock solid... I've never had it hunt on me during a shoot. If you're doing a lot of real estate tho, I've been really happy with the Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G too. It works so well in low light and it's basically weightless on the gimbal.
In my experience, wide glass shifts the center of gravity on UR gimbal. Basically:
1. Do u prioritize low-light f-stops?
2. Or focal flexibility?
Dont forget edge distortion!