Honestly I am just so fed up with my current kit right now because I keep missing the most important shots while I'm fumbling around swapping primes on my FX3. I love the look of my 35mm and 85mm but for this documentary project I'm starting in Seattle next month—it is a series on micro-breweries—I just cant keep stopping the action every five minutes to change glass. It is driving me absolutely crazy and I feel like I am wasting the potential of this camera. My logic was that I could just "make it work" with what I had but after a test shoot in a cramped cellar yesterday I realized I'm losing all the best organic moments because I am too slow.
I am getting really excited about finally just biting the bullet and getting a proper pro zoom but I am completely stuck on which one actually feels like a real cinema tool and not just a glorified photography lens. I was looking at the Sony 28-135mm f/4 because of the power zoom and the fact that it is actually designed for video but then I read some stuff online saying it is getting a bit old and maybe isnt sharp enough for 4K anymore? Is that true? Because if I am dropping over two grand I want it to be crisp. Then I thought okay maybe the Tamron 35-150mm because that f/2-2.8 range is insane for low light in those dark bars but does it have that "cinematic" soul or is it just gonna look like a generic wedding video? I am also worried about the weight since I am gonna be handheld for like 8 hours a day.
I have a budget of around $3000 max and I need to pull the trigger by the 15th so I have time to practice with it. I need something that plays nice with the FX3 autofocus because that is the whole reason I bought this body but I also hate focus breathing with a passion. Am I asking for too much? Is there a "holy grail" zoom that handles the low light of a brewery but still gives me that professional look...
That Sony FE PZ 28-135mm f/4 G OSS is sharp enough for 4K, but f/4 in a dim brewery is a recipe for noise. Since you mentioned tight spaces, these might fit better:
Regarding what #2 said about that Sony FE PZ 28-135mm f/4 G OSS being too slow, I actually disagree slightly on the f/4 being a dealbreaker. The FX3 is a beast at high ISO, so you can just kick it up to the 12800 base and f/4 becomes plenty for those dim brewery corners. The real choice comes down to the mechanics of the zoom.
> I am also worried about the weight since I am gonna be handheld for like 8 hours a day. In my experience, if youre doing documentary work in tight spots like breweries, you gotta look at the Sony FE 24-70mm f/2.8 GM II. Ive tried many zooms over the years and this one is basically the gold standard for the FX3. I know you were looking at that 28-135 but honestly that thing is a beast to carry around all day and f/4 is gonna kill you in those dark cellars. The GM II is way lighter than the first version and the autofocus is snappy as hell which is exactly why you got that body. Tbh focus breathing is almost non-existent on this glass and the image is super crisp for 4K. It fits right in your budget too. If you need more reach later just use the Clear Image Zoom... it works like a charm.