• $1500 budget


• weather sealed


• fast autofocus

is the gm ii worth the extra grand?

• needs to be fast because they run a lot


• not too heavy if possible because my back hurts


• works in low light since the games are at night under those stadium lights

What do I actually need to get so I don't mess this up? I'm in a huge rush...

I have been reading a ton of reviews and I am stuck between the Sony 85mm f1.4 GM and the newer 50mm f1.2 GM. Some people say the 85mm is the king for portraits but then I read other threads saying the AF is slow compared to the newer motors and that the 50mm is actually sharper on the high res sensors. But then there is the Sigma 85mm f1.4 DG DN which is way cheaper and apparently just as sharp? I dont want to buy something and then regret it when I see the eye autofocus missing shots during the ceremony because the lens motor couldnt keep up with the camera.

Here is what I am looking for:

• Budget is around $1800 to $2200 max


• Must handle the a7RV 61MP sensor without getting mushy at the edges


• Fast autofocus is a must because the couple is doing a lot of movement


• Needs that really creamy bokeh for those desert sunset shots


• Not too heavy if possible because we are hiking a bit to the spot

Is the 85mm GM still worth it in 2024 or am I better off going with the 50mm or even a different brand like the Samyang stuff? I am literally shaking looking at my bank account but I need to make a decision by Friday so I can get it delivered and test it out before the flight. Does the 1.2 vs 1.4 really make that much of a difference for the price jump on this specific body?

I've been looking at the 24-70mm GM II because obviously the native autofocus is supposed to be insane and it's light, but then I keep seeing guys on YouTube talking about the Tamron 35-150mm f2-2.8 being the king of all-around lenses. The range sounds amazing for not having to swap glass in the middle of a crowd, but I'm worried it's gonna be way too heavy for a long day of handheld shooting and maybe the AF wont keep up as well as the Sony glass? I also saw some people mentioning the 24-105mm G but f4 feels like it might be a struggle for those low light indoor shots in the smaller shops.

• Sony 24-70mm GM II


• Tamron 35-150mm


• Sony 24-105mm G (maybe too slow?)

If you guys could only bring one lens for a gig where you don't know what's coming next, what are you picking for these bodies?

I was thinking maybe the 35mm one because people said it fits more in the frame? But then I saw a video saying 50mm is better for the blurry background thing and now im just annoyed because i dont want to carry a huge heavy thing around. Why are some so much bigger than others if they do the same thing?? Is there a small one that isnt gonna make me look like a total tourist? What do i even buy...

I am heading to the Dolomites next month and really want something sharp but light enough for 10-mile hikes. Budget is around $1200 maybe a bit more if its worth it.

Looking at:

• Sony 20mm f1.8 G


• Tamron 17-28mm


• Maybe a Sigma?

I am worried about the balance and if the 20mm is gonna be wide enough for those massive peaks...

My main concerns are:

• Budget is strictly under $1000


• Needs to be light enough for all-day handheld shooting


• Looking for that creamy background blur for headshots

The 85mm seems like the smart choice for the price but I keep hearing the Sigma has better colors. Is the Sigma gonna be way too big for the C series body or should I just go for the smaller lens?...

I am getting really excited about finally just biting the bullet and getting a proper pro zoom but I am completely stuck on which one actually feels like a real cinema tool and not just a glorified photography lens. I was looking at the Sony 28-135mm f/4 because of the power zoom and the fact that it is actually designed for video but then I read some stuff online saying it is getting a bit old and maybe isnt sharp enough for 4K anymore? Is that true? Because if I am dropping over two grand I want it to be crisp. Then I thought okay maybe the Tamron 35-150mm because that f/2-2.8 range is insane for low light in those dark bars but does it have that "cinematic" soul or is it just gonna look like a generic wedding video? I am also worried about the weight since I am gonna be handheld for like 8 hours a day.

I have a budget of around $3000 max and I need to pull the trigger by the 15th so I have time to practice with it. I need something that plays nice with the FX3 autofocus because that is the whole reason I bought this body but I also hate focus breathing with a passion. Am I asking for too much? Is there a "holy grail" zoom that handles the low light of a brewery but still gives me that professional look...